4 ms·

One caveat to GH Pages is if the repo’s public then all your amendments, typos, mistakes etc can be seen in a diff due to the way GitHub works. Not sure about p

One caveat to GH Pages is if the repo’s public then all your amendments, typos, mistakes etc can be seen in a diff due to the way GitHub works. Not sure about private repos however. You may be able to conceal mistakes with that but not sure

aurbano 4y ago
I'd bet a significant amount of money that in most cases no one will ever bother to look through the commit history...
- bombcar 4y ago
  And if you're really worried about it you do your work in one repo and "publish" to another.
  - azangru 4y ago
    Or git commit --amend and force-push :-)
dont__panic 4y ago
If you're publishing a site to the internet anyway, anyone could download every page on your site, submit it to archive.org, take a screenshot, or manually copy your posts onto a notepad. I find the GH Pages + Jekyll workflow works really well for my purposes, and it's been a nice way to play around with static site generation to boot.