5 ms·

I don’t think that’s true?

• willcipriano 4y ago
  "Conspiracy to commit drug trafficking" would probably fit the bill. I think they could just call in the feds because from the state and federal perspective you are running a drug empire from that office.
  • zeroonetwothree 4y ago
    The feds don’t seem very concerned with marijuana lately
    • fartcannon 4y ago
      That's hardly the point.
  • oneoff786 4y ago
    But it’s not trafficking if you don’t move it across state lines?
    • brewdad 4y ago
      But your state of domicile would happily seize your ill-gotten gains the minute you try to bring the money home. You may not be moving the drug across state lines but the money certainly would.
      • oneoff786 4y ago
        Pretty sure you’re just making that up. That doesn’t make any sense. State laws don’t declare something is illegal anywhere. They declare they’re illegal within that state. It’s perfectly fine to do such things in other states.
  • yieldcrv 4y ago
    Nah, state level would have no jurisdiction over the criminal action and feds arent caring right now, but focusing on the state level you can also just form a branch So you go online and fill out an LLC for another state, and just say you are licensing your brand name to that LLC in another state that is doing all the sales in that state
    • willcipriano 4y ago
      "Your honor, this man, doing business as "weed.com", collected the proceeds from four thousand individual sales of marijuana from his office at 123 Fake Street." It's illegal to do that. What's the defense, it's legal to do that somewhere else? That part of the justice system doesn't play around. There are people in jail for felony murder for selling the baggies to the guy who sold the drugs to the guy who overdosed.
      • yieldcrv 4y ago
        It’s legal to license a brand name to an organization in another state Thats the only action that occurred in the state