3 ms·
>Fail. What motivated them was actual slaughter. The uhygers conducted a terrorist attack that killed many people. Think 9/11 but it happened in china so your b
by logicchains 4y ago
>Fail. What motivated them was actual slaughter. The uhygers conducted a terrorist attack that killed many people. Think 9/11 but it happened in china so your biased mind is unable to comprehend how bad it is because it didn't happen in your backyard.
So it's okay to jail and sterilise innocent people for the actions of a small number of people of the same ethnicity? Anyone who believes that is a truly horrible person, a monster who deserves to suffer the greatest pains in life, and I'd wish every misery upon them. I'd say the same thing about anyone who believes the American slaughter of innocent children in the middle east was justified, but fortunately most Americans now recognise that was a mistake and the US has mostly wound down its aggression in the middle east.
You're advocating for the exact same thing the terrorists did: harming innocent people for actions that they weren't directly responsible for, purely because of their ethnicity.
- deltaonefour 4y agoDid I say it's ok? No. Why don't you read the post. Before saying I'm advocating something I'm not. Basically Every American once thought it was 100 percent correct to send soldiers to the middle east. That sentiment will occur again if another terrorist attack happens on American soil. You're to young and niave to remember. Military recruiting was up during that time. The entire american attitude and sentiment changed overnight. If you fail to understand this sentiment and youre only able to understand the world from a singular perspective. Then you're basically very biased or just really young.