23 ms·
> They certainly were not good enough at Fukushima Then why would remaking the part be any better than redesigning the system?
by otter-rock 4y ago
> They certainly were not good enough at Fukushima
Then why would remaking the part be any better than redesigning the system?
- ncmncm 4y agoEither course would produce uncompetitive power. The best would be stop pouring money into the rathole.
- otter-rock 4y agoOk, so the safety argument doesn't even matter, so why debate it as a proxy for what you really mean?
- ncmncm 4y agoThe safety argument is one of several good reasons to cancel. They do not contradict, but add.
- otter-rock 4y ago