4 ms·
It's really not just syntatic sugar for style. It's a design system as well as a set of utility classes. Consider the difference between <span style="color:
by pocketsand 4y ago
It's really not just syntatic sugar for style.
It's a design system as well as a set of utility classes. Consider the difference between
<span style="color: #cccccc">Gray text</span> and <span class="text-gray-700">Gray text</span>
In the former, you can't just redefine what gray means. You've hard set it to a value you need to keep track of and keep consistent. On the right, you can configure what "700" means, switch between a cool gray or a blue gray, etc.
- jakelazaroff 4y agoSo use a custom property instead (don’t use inline styles tho): <span style=“color: var(--text-gray-700)”>Gray text</span> Or use Sass or something. This problem has been solved for like 15 years.
- hbn 4y agoI want the styles to be in the template though, because I don't want to bounce back and forth between 2 files when designing a single UI. And it's not just inline styles, there's some things Tailwind can do that a style tag can't. Such as screen size breakpoints. Here's how to make a div have 0.5rem of left/right padding on mobile, and 2rem on any screen larger: <div class="px-2 sm:px-8"> I'd much rather do this than mess with CSS's horrible media query syntax myself. And when I come back to this later, I don't have to cross-reference between (probably badly named) classes across 2 files to figure out how that div behaves.
- jakelazaroff 4y agoOkay, but now we’re back to Tailwind being back to syntactic sugar for styles (you can definitely put media queries in a style tag). I disagree with your preference; all the classnames are not easily parseable and obscure the markup, and I much prefer the CSS media query syntax. But that’s, like, just my opinion, man. If you like it better, don’t let me stop you!
- skttl 4y ago>(you can definitely put media queries in a style tag) How?
- jakelazaroff 4y ago<style>@media (min-width: 100px) {}</style>
- azemetre 4y agoThis is what tailwind does already. Colors are defined as design tokens in a config file: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/customizing-colors#color-object-syntax https://tailwindcss.com/docs/customizing-colors#color-object... Utility CSS is by far my favorite way to write CSS, especially in teams. It allows you to extract out multiple classnames that encapsulate all styles into a single classname. Why would you use Sass when plain CSS does the job better? Tailwind is just normal CSS, all the build steps are ways of making your stylesheets more efficient and removing dead code but it's all still CSS no preprocessor necessary.
- my80thaccount 4y agoThose are both just opaque values, if you wanted to gsub them it would be exactly the same.