> It's funny that this threads main objection to nuclear is waste/mining/etc Is it? I got the impression the discussion has moved to recognising that nuclear

> It's funny that this threads main objection to nuclear is waste/mining/etc Is it? I got the impression the discussion has moved to recognising that nuclear is too expensive, not flexible, and looking at the slow-motion-train-wreck that is the EPR project, new reactor projects are likely going to be very late[0][1][2] and hugely over budget. [0] https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Fresh-delay-to-Flamanville-blamed-on-impact-of-pan https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Fresh-delay-to-F... [1] https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/finlands-olkiluoto-3-goes-online-after-12-year-construction-delay/ https://www.globalconstructionreview.com/finlands-olkiluoto-... [2] https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/CGN-takes-Taishan-1-offline-following-fuel-failure https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/CGN-takes-Taisha...