2 ms·
Following seems to be squarely the responsibilities of C-Suite (including CEO). - The over-prioritization of certain products, which has led to a lack of focus
by achow 4y ago
Following seems to be squarely the responsibilities of C-Suite (including CEO).
- The over-prioritization of certain products, which has led to a lack of focus on other important issues like infrastructure
- Not being able to output any higher or better quality products and services despite aggressively hiring more employees
- A generally apathetic and sometimes condescending attitude from the CPO, COO, and Chief People Officer
- Initiatives like the Dot Collector and the Performance review system that has led to a toxic workplace culture
> ..fluff like "a generally apathetic and sometimes condescending attitude" is not actionable
Feedback like 'apathy' and 'condescending attitude' are very legit for employees and even to the interview candidates. Why fluff and not actionable in this case?
- elchupanebre 4y ago> The over-prioritization of certain products, which has led to a lack of focus on other important issues like infrastructure It comes down to someone's judgement call. It's usually not possible to quantify if "certain products" should be prioritized over "other important issues" or vice versa. Particularly so for someone who does not have the full picture. > Not being able to output any higher or better quality products and services despite aggressively hiring more employees Is it objective or just an opinion? If objective, how is it measured? > Why fluff and not actionable in this case? Because "Someone anonymous said some of you were generally apathetic and sometimes condescending". "Well, can you give specific examples? No? Then it's fluff and not actionable". The petition is immature and maybe 'condescending attitude' towards petitioner is deserved.