I'm in no way able to provide evidence because its very clever and full spectrum you dont realise what people are getting at the time. I've got wise to some of

I'm in no way able to provide evidence because its very clever and full spectrum you dont realise what people are getting at the time. I've got wise to some of it now, but you need to understand how the innuendo game plays. If you dont get innuendo, you wont get it, but its extremely clever and is something that is played out over decades. However I will leave you with this thought, if you recognise the existence of preemptive military attacks then it could be argued that the military dont accept the British legal stance of "innocent until proven guilty". Ergo anyone backing the military, backs state sanctioned illegal activity which is why the security/secret services exist!