3 ms·
>by volume most human interactions do not have to worry about censorship. I suspect this will increase over time. >if code isn't really law then we're just ba
by JacobThreeThree 4y ago
>by volume most human interactions do not have to worry about censorship.
I suspect this will increase over time.
>if code isn't really law then we're just back to systems of social consensus and there's no need for all this blockchain nonsense.
Exactly, and the "code is law" thing is not going so well, given that many of the programmer error catastrophes thus far have been "solved" by the social consensus of a small clique of developers.
- sleepymoose 4y ago>>by volume most human interactions do not have to worry about censorship. >I suspect this will increase over time. Do we still have to qualify this with suspicion? In a lot of ways, it's already increasing.