In the corporate world, "leaders" are incentivized by having more people in their orgs. It makes them have more "power". So they constantly broaden the scope an

In the corporate world, "leaders" are incentivized by having more people in their orgs. It makes them have more "power". So they constantly broaden the scope and try to hire more people. The leaders in software orgs never benefit from finishing projects early with less engineers. Nor do they benefit from maintaining stable and robust software. Making the project take longer with more engineers with complicated architectures makes them gain more power. Yeah, this makes me sad.