> Yes, but a lot of utilities give that functionality This does not excuse core OS functionality being left to rot. > That's false, maybe you refer to contain

> Yes, but a lot of utilities give that functionality This does not excuse core OS functionality being left to rot. > That's false, maybe you refer to containerization? Apple provides APIs to virtualize a system in 10 lines of code And not well. > That's up to MS Given the software story for the Mac is imploding, it is Apple's problem too. Apple could introduce a Proton-esque translation layer if they wanted to and make Macs significantly more useful machine at a stroke. > Absolutely false. It's just that the base models are differentiated this way This is unambiguously true - the M2 still cannot use multiple monitors correctly. > Yes but where do you find small puddings? It is a global design fad and even Linux distros adhered to this fashion Apple own their UI, Linux distro designers are not holding them at gunpoint. > Macs are not marketed to gamers They literally spent ten minutes of the keynote trying to market Macs to gamers.