4 ms·
That's almost certainly not true. E.g., https://www.embedded.com/risc-v-core-said-to-outperform-apple-m1-and-arm-cortex-a9/ https://www.embedded.com/risc-v-cor
by throwawaylinux 4y ago
That's almost certainly not true. E.g.,
https://www.embedded.com/risc-v-core-said-to-outperform-apple-m1-and-arm-cortex-a9/ https://www.embedded.com/risc-v-core-said-to-outperform-appl...
- Infinitesimus 4y ago> is said to To most consumers, this will only be interesting if it's shipping in laptops.
- ungamedplayer 4y ago
- culopatin 4y agoWhat laptops are shipping with this and are outperforming the Apple processors in real life?
- throwawaylinux 4y agoI'm not sure I was just responding to a claim about a CPU's performance per watt.
- StringyBob 4y agoThe quotes in that page have some of the most spectacularly misleading statistics I’ve seen for a while. Might as well point out that for telling the time looking at my watch is more energy efficient than looking at the clock in my car dashboard (and then calculating energy efficiency while comparing power consumption of a car and a watch)
- kayodelycaon 4y agoIs this a shipping product?
- throwawaylinux 4y agoNot sure. It's likely a lot of small low power CPUs can beat the likes of M1 on perf/watt tasks though. That one was just the first hit I got.