3 ms·
Why do you think this is the future of software? Wouldn't it be easier to have the provider manage the software/infra rather than having to do it yourself? (I
by LewisVerstappen 4y ago
Why do you think this is the future of software?
Wouldn't it be easier to have the provider manage the software/infra rather than having to do it yourself?
(I don't think you're wrong or anything. Just curious as to why you feel that way.)
Also, another example would be Ghost -> https://ghost.org/ https://ghost.org/
- parsley27 4y agoThe idea is that an organization can have full control over their applications while gaining scaling capabilities compared to resources that run on server instances. This helps with security/compliance, customization, cost management, etc. For smaller orgs, some of this software could be run at incredibly low costs of a few dollars a month or even within cloud free tiers. In the case of Ghost, while it can be hosted on cloud providers like AWS, its default/recommended stack isn't serverless as it uses a server instance. However, you can use something like https://github.com/jeshan/serverless-ghost https://github.com/jeshan/serverless-ghost to make it mostly serverless. Thanks!