4 ms·
>up until now you have to admit it's a dud The genie is out of the bottle, so that doesn't matter anymore. >You do know that Time Machine works perfectly fine
by cbs 15y ago
>up until now you have to admit it's a dud
The genie is out of the bottle, so that doesn't matter anymore.
>You do know that Time Machine works perfectly fine [...]
Yes, do go on. Lecture me about my environment and my needs.
>And yes MSE is third-aprty in the sense that it's not there right from the start
Not only do you not know what first-party means, if it was bundled in by default Microsoft would be right back in antitrust court.
>As for general maintenance, manageability and user assistance, my experience has been such as it is one or two orders of magnitude down from Windows.
Thats awesome, but I'm really not interested in your pissing contest.
- lloeki 15y ago> The genie is out of the bottle It has been for a long time, ever since around Mac OS 8 where the peak production of Mac malware happened. As Miller said, Mac OS X is not necessarily more secure but it's currently comfortably safer. That does not mean the area should not be watched for any evolution. > Lecture me about my environment and my needs. I did not wish to make it sound like a lecture, and am genuinely interested in what your environment looks like and what led you to using rsync instead of Time Machine, and how you overcame the cases I mentioned (if ever you were concerned by them in your use case). > Thats awesome, but I'm really not interested in your pissing contest. I'm not pissing anywhere, but you do seem pissed. If anything, your environment and needs, just like mine, are anecdotal.