4 ms·
I was under the impression that the "forced" upgrade to Sublime 4 caught quite a few out, and may have been a nail in the coffin. I'm still rocking SLT 3, and
by _puk 4y ago
I was under the impression that the "forced" upgrade to Sublime 4 caught quite a few out, and may have been a nail in the coffin.
I'm still rocking SLT 3, and it's my go-to for large file handling or just as a simple scratchpad, but development (of SLT) feels like it moves at a snails pace.
- w0m 4y ago> but development (of SLT) feels like it moves at a snails pace. This is how it's always been I think; their model.
- wsc981 4y ago> This is how it's always been I think; their model. I don't think ST needs to move fast. It's a good quality editor. It doesn't need a bunch of new features every couple of months. Just getting a major update once a year is fine imo.
- smolder 4y agoI'm in the same boat. I bought ST3 and have avoided going to 4, as now it's just my scratch pad and .txt viewer, not really used for development.
- Shorel 4y agoI can live with a 'LICENSE UPGRADE REQUIRED' text in the title bar. Everything works just the same, and I don't get the purchase pop-ups.