4 ms·

OK, so the AGI doesn't need to be intelligent about anything physical... What does that leave? What is it intelligent about? > think about humans who cannot a

OK, so the AGI doesn't need to be intelligent about anything physical... What does that leave? What is it intelligent about? > think about humans who cannot accomplish physical tasks of this standard. Babies Babies aren't intelligent, and without bodies they can never become intelligent. A baby who is fully paralyzed (disembodied) can't even learn to see or hear let alone operate intelligently in the world.

romanows 4y ago
A non-embodied AGI could know and reason about physical stuff. Non-physical intelligence abounds, no? This conversation we're having here is not in the physical world. You're right that babies aren't up to what my standard for AGI would be either, that's a bad example, good catch.