There is a darker Truth. Intelligence as tested by IQ by several govts and organizations is mostly genetic[1]. It means that the "nurture" part is not so much

There is a darker Truth. Intelligence as tested by IQ by several govts and organizations is mostly genetic[1]. It means that the "nurture" part is not so much important as people think. Heck you can even see with brothers / cousins the differences. When we say "gifted" it means we are selecting and optimizing for IQ. Thus the "inequality". You will always see more Asians. To make more equal we need to remove/disqualify asians. If a profession/skill is very related to a characteristic/feature as IQ then I want the best there. Not everyone is equal and not everyone has the same skills. If you check [1] you will see they studied TWINS adopted in families. There is no better "social intervention" than adopting someone, provide the same food/structure that all on family have. Then you can see here the confirmation in a soft way [2] and [3]. "and we consistently find that considering performance on the SAT/ACT, particularly the math section, substantially improves the predictive validity of our decisions with respect to subsequent student success at the Institute." I am not gifted but I do benefit from gifted people work. [1] - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289621000635 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962... [2] - https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-suspending-our-sat-act-requirement-for-the-2021-2022-application-cycle-as-well/ https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-suspending-our-... [3] - https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-reinstating-our-sat-act-requirement-for-future-admissions-cycles/ https://mitadmissions.org/blogs/entry/we-are-reinstating-our...