3 ms·
Hmm, I can't imagine having to deal with those things. People don't act like that where I live.
by bsuvc 4y ago
Hmm, I can't imagine having to deal with those things. People don't act like that where I live.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- lazide 4y agoSounds like you’re enabling some structural inequality, or something.
- DougN7 4y agoI’ve recently become friends with someone from the inner city “hood”. It’s just unbelievable. Like someone below said, it’s not about race as much as poverty. The sad thing from what I’ve seen is the culture is self-destructive. Instead of trying to help each other up and out, many pull others back down (economically, socially, etc). I used to naively think I had answers, but after seeing the breath and depth of the problem I have no idea what would help.
- zozbot234 4y agoThe crab mentality goes hand-in-hand with widespread poverty and lack of community development. In schooling it shows up as bullying those who are most academically successful, for being "nerds" or "acting white".
- cupofpython 4y agoLowkey I think the current education system has evolved from communities that allowed teachers to beat their kids to teach obedience. that obedience was passed down through generations in those communities establishing a culture of obedience for teachers. The current system, although non-violent, is still heavily leveraging the culture of obedience from students. when a kid is disobedient, usually the above mentioned communities threaten to move the kid into an environment where the obedience culture is even more strict as a result of even more violent punishment historically. Early days Public school teachers might lightly smack you with a ruler, early catholic school teachers might spank you, and early military school teachers might straight up beat the shit out of you. So I think by extending the current system to areas in poverty that do not have an established culture of obedience means we have to either change the system or start beating kids again imo. I vote for the former, obviously.
- corrral 4y agoMe neither, because I don't live in the part of town ~10 miles away where this is the case. Why don't I live there, even though the location would be more convenient and has far more nearby parks and businesses, the housing is dirt-cheap, they have better access to public transit than we do, the area's more walkable/bike-able, et c? The schools are bad. Why are the schools bad? Because people like me (that is, people whose kids have a low-stress life outside of school) won't move there. Digging out of that hole is nearly impossible. It amounts to "gentrify things all to hell" (which just shifts the problem around rather than actually solving it) or "fix huge social and economic problems the US has". In either case, you can't do much about it by focusing on the schools themselves.
- hyperhopper 4y agoConsider yourself lucky. Even worse, imagine being a child growing up in that environment. Actual fistfights were happening every few hours in school where I grew up.