4 ms·
Fortunately, it does take more than imagination to actually demonstrate, it requires facts and evidence.
by Finnucane 4y ago
Fortunately, it does take more than imagination to actually demonstrate, it requires facts and evidence.
- pyronik19 4y ago
- philjohn 4y agoI have, it has holes big enough to drive a big rig through, and has been widely panned by people who know about cell phone location tracking.
- pyronik19 4y agoSo they arrested and held in prison tons of people from Jan6 and held them in prison for over a year based on cell tracking data. I am sure you were objecting to that.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- themitigating 4y agohttps://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-usa-mules/fact-check-does-2000-mules-provide-evidence-of-voter-fraud-in-the-2020-u-s-presidential-election-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-usa-mules/fact-che... The movie is another attempt to use circumstantial evidence without actually having a proper investigation. Then all the Republicans angry that Trump didn't win will go to forums, like this one, and say "watch 2000 mules" without providing any details because when Trump lost they didn't get what they wanted and can't deal with it.
- rvz 4y ago
- themitigating 4y agoDid Reuters suppress the Hunter Biden laptop story? The Russian interference in the 2016 election did occur according the Muller report. "When it comes to 'fact checkers', not even they are honest either and like the media are as manipulative as the actual disinformation campaigns" How do you know they are equally manipulative? Considering the amount of time some news organizations have been around and the number or stories vs the semi recent introduction of bots
- pyronik19 4y ago"Factchecks" are nothing more than left wing propaganda opinion articles, they offer little to nothing of value. The "circumstantial" evidence is damning and they STILL refuse to investigate it.
- themitigating 4y agoCircumstantial evidence is never daming by it's own definition, especially in a court of law and many claims were investigated by the Barr. They also performed recounts in multiple locations even those controlled by Republicans. You have no proof and I consider it treason to continue to promote lies about election fraud as it attacks democracy.
- pyronik19 4y ago> I consider it treason to continue to promote lies about election fraud as it attacks democracy. I consider support for the obvious election fraud treason.. the only lie is we actually have a functioning democracy and legitimate elections.