> when something better than USB-C is available, do I think that should be allowed instead? what about "USB C is here to stay so why bother to worry about some

> when something better than USB-C is available, do I think that should be allowed instead? what about "USB C is here to stay so why bother to worry about something that will change in a distant future, if it will change at all?" Cui prodest? > That’s all the more reason to not make it a de jure standard. on the contrary that's all the more reason to do it. imagine if we used your mentality where we would be now hundreds of different de facto standards for light bulb sockets, power plugs, gas pumps, road size, traffic light colors. etc etc basically the definition of hell