4 ms·
Even today uBlock Origin is not able to run as intended by the author in Chrome (and maybe all other Chromium-based browsers). According to gorhill, the only br
by foepys 4y ago
Even today uBlock Origin is not able to run as intended by the author in Chrome (and maybe all other Chromium-based browsers). According to gorhill, the only browser that is able to unleash uBlock Origin's full potential is Firefox.
https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-b...
- phendrenad2 4y agoLuckily not many ads seem to be using these evasion methods, so Ublock works just fine on Edge in most cases.
- ffpip 4y agoAd domains being cloaked through CNAME records is really common nowadays (actively used by Adobe, Criteo and Eulerian, etc), and most analytics and ad software providers employ these tactics. https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/web-trackers-using-cname-cloaking-to-bypass-browsers-ad-blockers https://portswigger.net/daily-swig/web-trackers-using-cname-... https://medium.com/nextdns/cname-cloaking-the-dangerous-disguise-of-third-party-trackers-195205dc522a https://medium.com/nextdns/cname-cloaking-the-dangerous-disg...
- phendrenad2 4y agoI use Ublock and never see these, so I guess it depends on your definition of "really common".
- ffpip 4y agoThey are more common when using trackers and analytics (in the title of both the articles I linked), which you don't "see", unlike ads. It happens in the background
- attentive 4y agobrave blocks those for ~2 years now: https://brave.com/privacy-updates/6-cname-trickery/ https://brave.com/privacy-updates/6-cname-trickery/