To me those are in the category of "nice to have", and the problem is that every developer has different preferences for these [1] [2]. But the main features of

To me those are in the category of "nice to have", and the problem is that every developer has different preferences for these [1] [2]. But the main features of StrictYaml, like supporting comments and less syntactic noise, I think are pretty uncontroversial, and perhaps it's worth it to get people to switch over for those alone. It doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be a significant enough improvement over JSON, and I'd say those two features are more than enough [1]: https://github.com/crdoconnor/strictyaml/issues/37 https://github.com/crdoconnor/strictyaml/issues/37 [2]: https://github.com/crdoconnor/strictyaml/issues/38 https://github.com/crdoconnor/strictyaml/issues/38