3 ms·
> But backwards compatibility always wins, because it fits what the world was already designed around. Early Itanium included a x86 unit. Intel tried everythi
by josefx 4y ago
> But backwards compatibility always wins, because it fits what the world was already designed around.
Early Itanium included a x86 unit. Intel tried everything it could to push it.
> and I'm sure Esperanto is lightyears ahead of the monstrosity that is English
A lot of the complexity in English comes from active use and adapting to new concepts and integrating foreign words. Hopefully Esperanto will never be in a position to suffer the same issue and join the ranks of Itanium instead.