No, I was referring to the subtle implication that he belongs to or identifies with one or more of the following groups: >right-wing politicians, fundamentalis

No, I was referring to the subtle implication that he belongs to or identifies with one or more of the following groups: >right-wing politicians, fundamentalist religious leaders, political commentators in mainstream print and television media, and white supremacist terrorists Which is basically dismissing his argument by calling him a racist. Instead you should quantify how different the situation at hand is than bolshevism or marxism. This would help people who have less information one way or the other to identify the truth more easily.