4 ms·
Good on them! I was disappointed when Google quickly complied with last year's request by the Japanese government to take down the sengoku38 videos (leaked vid
by jayfuerstenberg 15y ago
Good on them!
I was disappointed when Google quickly complied with last year's request by the Japanese government to take down the sengoku38 videos (leaked video evidence of a Chinese fishing vessel trespassing into Japanese waters and ramming a Japanese Coast Guard vessel twice).
After that DVDs of the original video were anonymously left in a box for anyone to pick up and watch at home.
I suppose even if Google is eventually forced to comply, the original poster has some options to get the truth out.
- jayfuerstenberg 15y agoHere is the video reposted to Youtube ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-ugZ1bjaH0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q-ugZ1bjaH0 ) for those interested.
- verroq 15y ago>leaked video evidence of a Chinese fishing vessel trespassing into Japanese waters and ramming a Japanese Coast Guard vessel twice The Senkaku Islands are a disputed territory and from the video, you could easily say the Japanese coast guard boat cut in front of the Chinese boat, thus causing the collision. Let's lets not forget the 2008 incident where a Japanese coast guard rammed a Taiwanese fishing ship and Japan had to pay compensation as a result. I don't see why you must take sides when the matter is murkier than it is, probably due to your own political bias but I digress. In summary: a title of 2010 "Senkaku boat collision incident" should be appropriate. There is no need to simplify it if you can't keep a neutral point of view because it detracts from your main point.
- jayfuerstenberg 15y agoSorry, I have no intention of taking sides. I only highlight the sengoku38 event as one where Google didn't stand its ground, and how impressed I am that at least this time they are refusing to take down the police brutality video.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]