I kind of hope that happens. First of all, still charging for the spec is ridiculous. So most people really have no idea how (over)complicated or long it is, ex

I kind of hope that happens. First of all, still charging for the spec is ridiculous. So most people really have no idea how (over)complicated or long it is, except by trawling through a C++ reference implementation. E.g. AVIF does this much, much better. Do we really need to support images with 4096 channels in a web browser? And the name is going to be super confusing; it's too close to JPEG.