4 ms·
The addition of "(This Time)" in the article's title is just short of outrageous, if I'm not misunderstanding. It seems to me there's nothing indicating Google
by famousactress 15y ago
The addition of "(This Time)" in the article's title is just short of outrageous, if I'm not misunderstanding. It seems to me there's nothing indicating Google has ever taken down videos of police brutality at the govt's requests.. but rather, has complied with many other types of legal requests from the US?
- thret 15y agoFWIW I trust Google's "don't be evil" policy over the US government.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- famousactress 15y agoOh, interesting. They've quietly removed that bit from the title. I guess I'm not alone in finding it awful, then. [Edit: For anyone confused, the title of the article (RWW, and HN) was originally "Google Denies Requests To Remove Videos of Police Brutality (This time)". It's been updated sometime since yesterday evening without explanation.]