4 ms·
I think the problem with this assertion is that how do you differentiate between specialization and the "G" for general in AGI. ... in many ways, wouldn't a tr
by Enginerrrd 4y ago
I think the problem with this assertion is that how do you differentiate between specialization and the "G" for general in AGI. ... in many ways, wouldn't a tree meet your definition of AGI? (Perhaps it should?)
Like, at a sufficiently granular level, I probably couldn't "tree" very well, even with the assistance of tremendous computing power. There's vast amounts of computation being performed during a tree doing its thing. But is a tree really a general intelligence?
- andrewflnr 4y agoI don't think a tree would, I don't think it acts on and reacts to its environment in the way we're looking for. A squirrel probably would, though, and honestly I think that's ok, since we still have no idea how to make something that navigates its world (and steals birdseed) with the efficiency of a squirrel.