7 ms·
But, as always, not beyond criticism. It commits the usual 'designer' sin of using a spindly font that seems designed only to be viewed in print or on the highe
by gwern 4y ago
But, as always, not beyond criticism. It commits the usual 'designer' sin of using a spindly font that seems designed only to be viewed in print or on the highest-resolution possible device, and the low contrast makes it even harder to read - and then its way of denoting links is to make them even lower contrast...? (Ironically, I find it more readable with NoScript.)
It's meant to be read in long sittings, but it heavily uses looped animations to distract the reader the entire time, and it's surprisingly hard to navigate to the next page. I don't know if it would be appropriate to bind Space/PgDwn/Right to the next page, but the link could certainly be much larger and easier to hit.