You're right. I thought your comment was replying that in current implementations (not in the context of QUIC), the NATed peer wouldn't need STUN anyways, as of

You're right. I thought your comment was replying that in current implementations (not in the context of QUIC), the NATed peer wouldn't need STUN anyways, as of today. I had lost the context of it referring to an hypothetical implementarion over QUIC.