4 ms·

Why?

• buffington 4y ago
  The OP expresses exactly why on their site. Let's assume you didn't read their site though. Why not?
  • JoshTko 4y ago
    All the reasons are technical but nothing about an actual user need. Especially given the cost and complexity and most likely sub native window user experience this project seems to serve no actual utility.
    • buffington 4y ago
      > this project seems to serve no actual utility I think booting Windows on a M1 qualifies as "actual utility" for a lot of people. Just because you don't see any value in the project doesn't mean other people agree with you.
      • JoshTko 4y ago
        Windows on M1 is a technical achievement but has seemingly no user benefits. User benefit would be better battery life, lower cost etc. This project has none of that. It's like running doom on a pacemaker, kind of cool but the feat is the end goal rather than delivering some real benefit beyond a technical POC.