2 ms·
Yes. I have no idea why ECT gets left off of lists so often, because it's almost always within 1% of the best tools on size, and at least several times faster t
by bscphil 4y ago
Yes. I have no idea why ECT gets left off of lists so often, because it's almost always within 1% of the best tools on size, and at least several times faster than them on speed.
As far as I can tell, pingo isn't cross platform or open source, in addition to the issue you mention with the license statement, which makes it extremely limiting for e.g. automated processing of images on a server. I think ECT is absolutely a reasonable choice for most use cases.
- Zababa 4y agoI didn't know about ECT even after searching for a while. Maybe it's lacking in visibility? I'll give it a try. As for pingo, I can run it without issues with wine. I would personally prefer an open source tool though, so if ECT is really around 1% of pingo and not too much slower, I would prefer it.