3 ms·
You're being uncharitable. I read it as a way for a person to prove they took the video, not as a database of person<->signing key. In other words, the governme
by colejohnson66 4y ago
You're being uncharitable. I read it as a way for a person to prove they took the video, not as a database of person<->signing key. In other words, the government would only be able to see that video 123 was signed by signature 456. It would be up to the poster to prove they own the camera that produced signature 456.
- tinus_hn 4y agoSo as long as you never post any video you made with that camera on any account that is not anonymous, you’re safe. In other words, completely impractical. This is exactly why all these identifiers and all this tracking are harmful: you can never be anonymous, there’s always someone watching who can couple everything you do to your identity. And it happens with you knowing as little about it as possible.