3 ms·
> but it was developed after this post was written The article literally compares it to others. It might not have been finalized at the time of writing, but it
by fooqux 4y ago
> but it was developed after this post was written
The article literally compares it to others. It might not have been finalized at the time of writing, but it's not like the author was unaware of it.
- re 4y agoI think you misunderstand pizza; the article compares JPEG XL, but it doesn't compare the new lossless coder implementation (fjxl/fast_lossless), which is a separate tool/binary from cjxl.