4 ms·
> I was set to be all libertarian about this… Disallowing patents is the libertarian solution, though it would be up to the customers to demand published speci
by nybble41 4y ago
> I was set to be all libertarian about this…
Disallowing patents is the libertarian solution, though it would be up to the customers to demand published specifications and official support for interoperability.
- dfox 4y agoThe original intention of patent system was to encourage open publication of inventions. It even still works that way for some verticals. The issue is that it also produced a system that it is profitable to game and thus there are patent attorneys who get by by writing the patent in as vague terms as is possible to pass by patent reviewers, and in these kind of adversarial situations it is quite obvious that the private sector will win over the government bureaucrats.
- nybble41 4y ago> The original intention of patent system was to encourage open publication of inventions. That is how it was sold to the public. Unfortunately the system was never designed with the proper structure and incentives to ensure that patents were only granted when doing so actually resulted in the publication of accurate details about useful inventions which would not have become known to the public anyway well before the patent period expired. In practice, if you think you can keep something a trade secret for more than 20 years without it being independently reinvented you'll do that and not file for a patent. Patents are thus useful only in those cases where a patent is expected to be worse for the public than a trade secret, as they inhibit independent reinvention and reverse engineering for the duration of the patent.