4 ms·

>> there's still no snapping for useful window management Yes, but a lot of utilities give that functionality >> virtualisation is an afterthought That's fal

>> there's still no snapping for useful window management Yes, but a lot of utilities give that functionality >> virtualisation is an afterthought That's false, maybe you refer to containerization? Apple provides APIs to virtualize a system in 10 lines of code >> there's still no Windows story for the M1/M2 That's up to MS >> the M1/M2 has terrible monitor support Absolutely false. It's just that the base models are differentiated this way >>> the UI padding is still too high Yes but where do you find small puddings? It is a global design fad and even Linux distros adhered to this fashion >> and there's no coherent gaming story Macs are not marketed to gamers

Mindwipe 4y ago
> Yes, but a lot of utilities give that functionality This does not excuse core OS functionality being left to rot. > That's false, maybe you refer to containerization? Apple provides APIs to virtualize a system in 10 lines of code And not well. > That's up to MS Given the software story for the Mac is imploding, it is Apple's problem too. Apple could introduce a Proton-esque translation layer if they wanted to and make Macs significantly more useful machine at a stroke. > Absolutely false. It's just that the base models are differentiated this way This is unambiguously true - the M2 still cannot use multiple monitors correctly. > Yes but where do you find small puddings? It is a global design fad and even Linux distros adhered to this fashion Apple own their UI, Linux distro designers are not holding them at gunpoint. > Macs are not marketed to gamers They literally spent ten minutes of the keynote trying to market Macs to gamers.