Having a little trouble with language are you? The headline and the story dont support your interpretation. The story says that closing tax loopholes that all

Having a little trouble with language are you? The headline and the story dont support your interpretation. The story says that closing tax loopholes that allow separate allocation of expenses and revenue will gain the US up to $60B in revenues. A more sensible allocation is based on number of employees or revenues, or cost of production. Apologies to those who dont like snide remarks, but I also dislike distortion to make a political point.