re: [2] Diehl regularly blocks users who point out that he works at or has worked at Adjoint, and blockchain-based information seems to have been scrubbed from

re: [2] Diehl regularly blocks users who point out that he works at or has worked at Adjoint, and blockchain-based information seems to have been scrubbed from its website. Why does he not talk about the fact that most of the tools he has built upon, like Bulletproofs, Groth16 provers, Sonic, is research that is funded and driven by the crypto and blockchain space? [a] Why does he seem to hide the competing interest: that the goals of Adjoint Inc, the company he is a director of [b], are to drive more users away from public permissionless blockchains, and toward private permissioned blockchains? Most crypto proponents will admit they hold crypto and use blockchains, rather than scrubbing it from their timelines and blocking anybody who points out their ties to blockchains. If Diehl were more transparent about his use of blockchain-funded technology and the goals of his own private-blockchain-based company, it would probably give his arguments more credibility. [a] - https://github.com/orgs/adjoint-io/repositories https://github.com/orgs/adjoint-io/repositories [b] - https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/10613141/officers https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/c... EDIT: lol I am getting downvoted for posting these questions, and due to my limited karma its likely that my comment will soon be hidden. the irony.