> just use async everywhere. That’s not the solution in Rust. It simply won’t work for the same reason that Rust isn’t GC’d. At this point, I have to say RC

> just use async everywhere. That’s not the solution in Rust. It simply won’t work for the same reason that Rust isn’t GC’d. At this point, I have to say RC is a primitive form of GC and it would mostly work. Not high performance but it would work. > To be clear, I hate programming language development driven by memes. I don’t think that was the case with Rust async First, most programming is driven by fads. Second, my point was that if Rust waited more people would pan it for not having async. Rust async was "rushed". It took years, but we still didn't get smooth experience out of it. Many pieces were missing. It was rushed because many people wanted it, many developers were sick of having it in limbo, etc. > Today, in safe rust, it is impossible to allocate a structure larger than the stack. Placement new is always just around the bend. I don't follow Rust development too detailed nowadays, but if you are experiencing hardships, have you considered providing support to it? Either via money or time donations? I understand complaining that some closed source company is prohibiting you from doing something, but this is an OSS project. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E_rtUgUF58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9E_rtUgUF58