4 ms·
The difference is that maud does most of the work compile-time, so `html! { div { "foo" } }` compiles into literal "<div>foo</div>" hardcoded in the program, wi
by pornel 4y ago
The difference is that maud does most of the work compile-time, so `html! { div { "foo" } }` compiles into literal "<div>foo</div>" hardcoded in the program, without allocating intermediate HTMLTagBuilder objects.
- hu3 4y agoAnother difference is htmlgo is just plain Go, no macros. So it plays nice with IDEs and other tooling.