3 ms·
Well, as mentioned, I've yet to find something that can replace Maud without sacrificing it's advantages (in-code inheritance, code-sharing and compile-time typ
by zaarn 4y ago
Well, as mentioned, I've yet to find something that can replace Maud without sacrificing it's advantages (in-code inheritance, code-sharing and compile-time type-safety).
So even if it's not the "optimal approach" as you title it, it's the ergonomic approach for me because it doesn't get in my way.
- rbanffy 4y agoFor these requirements, it's indeed a good choice. It's just not a use case I've seen often.