3 ms·
That is the exact opposite of what the article argues. It says to stop putting everything (or rather, a ridiculous amount of money) into high energy particle p
by brazzy 4y ago
That is the exact opposite of what the article argues.
It says to stop putting everything (or rather, a ridiculous amount of money) into high energy particle physics and start funding other experiments.
- robga 4y agoRight, the article doesn't argue for fusion funding. But elsewhere the author has advocated it with "fusion power is a goal worth spending billions on". And in his "Why Particle Colliders Will Go Extinct" article, he supports the billions spent on fusion. The author's other writings include: - Gun Ownership Neither Increases Nor Decreases the Crime Rate - Fleeing Paris Accords Makes Scientific Sense - NSF Should Stop Funding Social 'Science'