4 ms·
> Besides it is so expensive you could give a 100.000 physicist a million bucks and that would be more productive. Would it? A bunch of the arguments in the ar
by Avamander 4y ago
> Besides it is so expensive you could give a 100.000 physicist a million bucks and that would be more productive.
Would it? A bunch of the arguments in the article apply to pretty much all science funding.
- isaacfrond 4y agoNo! It would not. You could fund attic hobby projects all year long, but it's never going to give new data. It is one of the great perks of civilization that you can combine resources to make something truly awesome, whether it is pyramids, moon landings or large colliders.