> Even viewing these RFCs in the best light, as "improvements", it stands to reason that end users will not be the ones who benefit most (if at all) from them.

> Even viewing these RFCs in the best light, as "improvements", it stands to reason that end users will not be the ones who benefit most (if at all) from them. That's kind of how I see it. A lot of internet protocols have ended up having privacy and security issues, but not so much by design. We saw the problems introduced with HTTP/2 and it appears like we're just doubling down on them instead of trying to find solutions. I guess I'm just nostalgic for the days things were made to benefit internet users rather than the people looking to make money off of them.