5 ms·
The other is the ridiculously shitty micro-HDMI ports. Why did they cripple the 400 with this junk? Micro-HDMI should never, never be used unless the device is
by NonNefarious 4y ago
The other is the ridiculously shitty micro-HDMI ports. Why did they cripple the 400 with this junk?
Micro-HDMI should never, never be used unless the device is so small that a regular HDMI is impossible to implement. Even then... you should probably just make the device bigger.
- ahartmetz 4y agoAh yes... to explain: they require adapters, and these adapters are mechanically fragile - tugging the cable can break them. Ask me how I know...
- NonNefarious 4y agoThe ports themselves are mechanically fragile. You're not just breaking an adapter; you're breaking the device itself. Which why one should also not buy Canon's "cinema" cameras (R5 C) that are similarly crippled with micro-HDMI (but astronomically more expensive).
- ahartmetz 4y agoI thought of it - I can be happy that the adapter broke, maybe they are weak on purpose.