Passing a test that someone has laid out seems easily within reach. It's coming up with the test and defining success that's the impossible part. I still don't

Passing a test that someone has laid out seems easily within reach. It's coming up with the test and defining success that's the impossible part. I still don't see human intelligence being threatened, just because we can define some goal and make an algorithm that's good at it. Put another way, tacit knowledge, that you can't write down as a set of rules, is what's hard, so having ML that can solve what we can write down means very little.