2 ms·
"only" an order of magnitude. Never mind comparing bleeding edge NVMe with (by now) decade-old DDR3, while the current bleeding edge DDR5 is now trickling out
by Panzer04 4y ago
"only" an order of magnitude.
Never mind comparing bleeding edge NVMe with (by now) decade-old DDR3, while the current bleeding edge DDR5 is now trickling out at 100GB/s+ pretty easily.
Never mind DDR memory latencies of ~50ns, vs NVMe at 50uS+.
Just because the user doesn't notice GUI problems doesn't mean it's not going to be a catastrophic bottleneck in any memory-intensive application.