> Why is Math specially subsidized? That’s good argument. First, that's a question, not an argument. Second, math is special because it's an exact science, as

> Why is Math specially subsidized? That’s good argument. First, that's a question, not an argument. Second, math is special because it's an exact science, as opposed to a natural science. Encompassing the study of "logic", "information", "things that change", "symmetry", "equality" or equivalence... it applies to pretty much everything. In other words it's one of the skills that has the most potential to be widely applicable. > Again, you’re just aiming your conclusion. I'm not sure what you mean by "aiming", but I am referring to the burden of proof [1], which the author has not shifted one iota. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)