16 ms·
I never said genetics as a whole is not credible, it's the random part that I think is off, just to clarify. From our brief history of mankind, I don't think t
by gldalmaso 15y ago
I never said genetics as a whole is not credible, it's the random part that I think is off, just to clarify.
From our brief history of mankind, I don't think there's enough information and hard fact to either prove or refute the random factor, as far as I know it is just accepted. I could also be wrong since I'm not all that up to date in this matter.
- jforman 15y agoThe mechanisms of traditional genetics, which include (at a simplified level) random variation at the base-pair level, are extremely well understood. The impact of this potential new mechanism of inheritance is unknown, but it will only add to our current understanding of how things work. It will not tear down our understanding.