"...isn't there a point where--when you are proselytizing about the evil labors of the man who died 24 hours earlier--you're kind of just an asshole?" Are you s

"...isn't there a point where--when you are proselytizing about the evil labors of the man who died 24 hours earlier--you're kind of just an asshole?" Are you saying there is no amount of "evil labors" a man can do for which he deserves nothing but glorification for 24 hours? At risk of Godwinning, I think you and I can both name a historical figure or three for whom we'd have no qualms "proselytizing the evil labors of" less than 24 hours after they died. The point being, your ad hominem is wrong, Stallman isn't being an asshole, he just saw Jobs as you see those historical figures. The fact that we all (yes, including me) disagree with that view of Jobs is irrelevant to and absolutely does not call for an ad hominem against Stallman.